Access to remedies and emerging ethical dilemmas: changing contours within the business - human rights debate

Justin Jos

Resumen


The aim of this paper is to contest the inclusion of human rights waivers in settlement agreements and argue that such agreements create barriers to access to justice especially in cases involving corporate human rights abuse. Settlements, which essentially use human rights waivers, are widely touted as the desired remedial norm in cases of corporate wrongdoings. These agreements force the survivors of corporate wrongdoings to waive their right to access judicial remedies and nonchalantly extinguish the legal liability of corporations in exchange for monetary compensation. To tackle this contentious issue this paper will firstly explore settlement agreements from an ethical perspective. Secondly, it will be argued that such human rights waivers create compulsive situations because of which survivors are denied their human rights. The article will take three different perspectives on how these compulsive situations can be counter-theorized namely through: asserting the right to life, challenging settlements through public policy clauses and securing ethical remedies within the Guiding Principles. The paper concludes by stating that the nature of remedies needs to be embedded in a more ethical framework to address complex business-human rights issues. It is important to explore the research through the prism of interdisciplinary research considering the magnitude of its consequences on the lives of many who are effected by such indirect violations of their remedial rights.

Palabras clave


WAIVERS, RIGHTS, COMPULSIONS, BUSINESS, CORPORATIONS

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


BLACKWELL, Amy Hackney. The essential law dictionary. Naperville, Ill: Sourcebooks, 2008. v. 1. (Sphinx Dictionaries).

BOOTH, Robert. Qatar World Cup construction “will leave 4,000 migrant workers dead”. The Guardian, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.theguardian.com/global- development/2013/sep/26/qatar-world-cup-migrant-workers-dead. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2018.

CHEN-WISHART, Mindy. Contract law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

HOMSKY, Noam. U. S. Defense and corporate social responsibility? Noam Chomsky interviewed by an anonymous interviewer. Disponível em: https://chomsky.info/19810408/. Acesso em: 2 maio 2018.

COLEMAN, Jules; SILVER, Charles. Justice in settlements. Social Philosophy and Policy, v. 4, n. 1, p. 102-144, 1986.

CROSSETTE, Barbara. India Supreme Court backs Carbide’s Bhopal Settlement. The New York Times, 1989. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes. com/1989/12/23/business/india-supreme-court-backs-carbide-s-bhopal-settlement.html. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2018.

DEVA, Surya; BILCHITZ, David (Org.). Building a treaty on business and human rights: context and contours. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

DONNELLY, Jack. The relative universality of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, v. 29, n. 2, p. 281-306, 2007.

EARTH RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL. Survivors of Rape by Barrick Gold Security Guards Offered “Business Grants” and “Training” in Exchange for Waiving Legal Rights. Disponível em: https://earthrights.org/media/survivors-of-rape-by-barrick-gold-security-guards-offered-business-grants-and-training-in-exchange-for-waiving-legal-rights/. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2018.

FEINBERG, Joel. Legal paternalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, v. 1, n. 1, p. 105-124, 1971.

FRIEDMAN, Milton. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In: ZIMMERLI, Walther Ch; HOLZINGER, Markus; RICHTER, Klaus (Org.). Corporate ethics and corporate governance. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. p. 173-178. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14.

GARNER, Bryan A.; BLACK, Henry Campbell. Black’s law dictionary. [s.l.: s.n.], 2014.

GRIFFIN, James. On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238781.001.0001/acprof-9780199238781.

HART, H. L. A. Legal rights. In: Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

HYLTON, Keith N. Agreements to waive or to arbitrate legal claims: an economic analysis. Supreme Court Economic Review, v. 8, p. 209-263, 2000.

IEP. Human rights. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponível em: https://www.iep.utm.edu/hum- rts/#SH4c. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2018.

INDIA. The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing Of Claims) Act. Disponível em: https://indiankanoon. org/doc/1510537/.

KINLEY, David; TADAKI, Junko. From talk to walk: the emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 44, n. 4, p. 931, 2004.

LOCKE, John. The second treatise of civil government and a letter concerning toleration. Oxford : B. Blackwell, 1948. Disponível em: https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9910095262102121.

MACCORMICK, Neil. Children’s rights : a test-case for theories of right. ARSP: Archiv für Rechtsund Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, v. 62, n. 3, p. 305-317, 1976.

MCDONALD, Pamela. How enforceable are settlement agreement waivers? ConstructionWeekOnline.com. Disponível em: http://www.constructionweekonline.com/arti- cle-43316-how-enforceable-are-settlement-agreement-waivers/. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2018.

OHCHR. International standards. Disponível em: http:// www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Executions/Pages/Inter- nationalStandards.aspx. Acesso em: 1 maio 2018.

OHCHR. 2017 Forum on Business and Human Rights. Disponível em: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ Issues/Business/ForumSession6/ConceptNote.pdf. Acesso em: 17 abr. 2018.

PALFIN, R. A.; DANNINGER, B. B. Hedonic damages: proving damages for lost enjoyment of living. [s.l.]: Michie, 1990.

PAPENDICK, Michael; BOHNER, Gerd. Passive victim: strong survivor? Perceived meaning of labels applied to women who were raped. PLoS ONE, v. 12, n. 5, p. e0177550, 2017.

POSNER, R. A. Economic analysis of law. 9. ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2014. (Aspen Casebook Series).

QATAR. Regarding promulgating the Civil Code. Disponível m: http://www.almeezan.qa/LawView.aspx?opt& LawID=2559&language=en#Section_8886. Acesso em: 30 abr. 2018.

RADIN, Margaret Jane. Market-inalienability. Harvard Law Review, v. 100, n. 8, p. 1849-1937, 1987.

RAZ, Joseph. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. (Clarendon Paperbacks).

SCHUTTER, Olivier de. Waiver of rights and state paternalism under the European Convention on Human Rights. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, v. 51, n. 3, p. 481-508, 2000.

SEN, Amartya. Human rights and the limits of law lecture. Cardozo Law Review, v. 27, n. 6, p. 2913, 2006.

STEPHENS, Beth. The amorality of profit: transnational corporations and human rights Stefan A. Riesenfeld Symposium 2001. Berkeley Journal of International Law, v. 20, n. 1, p. 45, 2002.

UNHCR. Vienna Declaration and programme of action. Disponível em: http://www.refworld.org/ docid/3ae6b39ec.html. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2018.

UNITED NATIONS. Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework. [s.l.]: Human Rights Council, 2011.

UNITED NATIONS. Report of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises. New York: United Nations General Assembly, 2017. Disponível em: http://opil.ouplaw. com/view/10.1093/law-oxio/e285.013.1/law-oxio-e285. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2018.

UNITED NATIONS. The corporate responsibility to respect human rights: an interpretive guide. [s.l.]: United Nations, 2012.

UNITED NATIONS. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. Disponível em: http://www.un.org/ en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2018.

UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Basic principles and guidelines on the right to a remedy and reparation for victims of gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law.

VAN DROOGHENBROECK, Sébastien. Conflict and consent: does the theory of waiver of fundamental rights offer solutions to settle their conflicts ? In: SMET, Stijn; BREMS, Eva (Org.). When human rights clash at the European Court of Human Rights: conflict or harmony? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

WENAR, Leif. Rights. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (Org.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2015. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ fall2015/entries/rights/. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2018.

ZYLBERMAN, Ariel. Kant’s juridical idea of human rights. In: MALIKS, Reidar; FØLLESDAL, Andreas (Org.). Kantian theory and human rights. New York: Routledge, 2013. p. 232.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v15i2.5347

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia