The immunity of international organizations in labour disputes: developments before international tribunals, national courts and the Colombian jurisdiction

Walter Arevalo-Ramirez, Ricardo Abello-Galvis

Resumo


The article aims to analyze and explain the recent developments and challenges regarding the jurisdictional immunity of international organizations in labour disputes, both by international and national courts, concluding with remarks on the experience of the Colombian case law in the matter. The article uses both case-law review and comparative law methodologies to first explain the main differences between diplomatic immunity and the immunity of international organizations regarding labour disputes, then, it describes the current legal trends regarding the applicable law to labour relations between international organizations and individuals, and the challenges to the immunity of the organization when disputes arise. The article develops the modern trend of requiring the organization to activate internal dispute resolution mechanisms to uphold its immunity before national courts. Finally, the article studies the incomplete reception of the principles governing the immunity of international organizations by recent Colombian case law. The article concludes that although international case law over the past decade widely recognizes functional immunity and jurisdictional immunity as the governing law in international organizations, it is still a controversial topic that has demanded fast developments regarding the applicable law, the differences with diplomatic immunity as understood by local authorities (expanding on the example of Colombia) and the design of innovative dispute resolution mechanisms within international organizations.
Keywords: Immunity of international organizations, Diplomatic immunity, Host State, national officials, functional immunity. labour disputes.

Palavras-chave


Immunity of international organizations, Diplomatic immunity, Host State, national officials, functional immunity. labour disputes.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


ABELLO GALVIS, Ricardo. La Corte Constitucional y el derecho internacional Los tratados y el control previo de constitucionalidad 1992-2004. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos 7.1 2005: 305-382.

ABELLO-GALVIS, Ricardo, ARÉVALO RAMÍREZ, Walter. La inmunidad de las organizaciones internacionales y de sus funcionarios cuando son nacionales del Estado sede. Diferencias con la inmunidad diplomática y experiencias de la jurisprudencia internacional y colombiana. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional. Volumen XXI. 2021

ABELLO-GALVIS, Ricardo, ARÉVALO RAMÍREZ, Walter. La inmunidad de las organizaciones internacionales y de sus funcionarios cuando son nacionales del Estado sede. Diferencias con la inmunidad diplomática y experiencias de la jurisprudencia internacional y colombiana. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional. Volumen XXI. 2021.

ABELLO-GALVIS, Ricardo. La Costumbre como Fuente de Derecho Internacional: una Caja de Pandora Imposible de Cerrar. Derecho internacional: varias visiones, un maestro. Liber amicorum en homenaje a Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra. 2015: 3-28. Ed. Universidad del Rosario.

ARAÚJO KALLÁS, Fernanda. A imunidade de jurisdição das Organizações Internacionais face ao direito de acesso à justiça. Revista de Direito Internacional – Brazilian Journal of International Law 13.3. 2016.

ARÉVALO RAMÍREZ, Walter, GARCÍA LÓPEZ, Luisa Fernanda. La interpretación constitucional y sus métodos en el sistema jurídico norteamericano, una interacción entre lo político y lo jurídico: Teorías y casos de estudio. Ius et Praxis 24.2, 2018: 393-430.

ARÉVALO-RAMÍREZ, Walter. Organizaciones Internacionales Manual de derecho internacional público. Fundamentos, tribunales internacionales y casos de estudio. 2020. 2da Ed. Tirant Lo Blanch Editorial. España.

BARKER, J. Craig, WARBRICK, Colin, MCGOLDRICK, Dominic. State Immunity, Diplomatic Immunity and Act of State: A Triple Protection against Legal Action?. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 47.4. 1998: 950-958.

BAXTER, Richard R. Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law. British Yearbook of International Law. 41. 1965. 275.

Belgium. Brussels Appeals Court. Manderlier v. United Nations and Belgian State: Decision of 15 September 1969

Belgium. Brussels Appeals Court. Manderlier v. United Nations and Belgian State: Decision of 15 September 1969 United Nations Juridical Yeabook 1969.

Belgium. Brussels Appeals Court. Manderlier v. United Nations and Belgian State: Decision of 15 September 1969 United Nations Juridical Yeabook 1969.

Belgium. Siedler v. Western European Union, Belgian Labor Court of Appeals, Brussels, September 17, 2003, Journal des Tribunaux 2004, 617.

Belgium. Western European Union v Siedler, Belgian Court of Cassation, 21 December 2009. Paras. 48-55.

BERENSON, William M. Squaring the Concept of Immunity with the Fundamental Right to a Fair Trial: The Case of OAS. World Bank Legal Review. 3. 2012: 133.

BROWN, Jonathan. Diplomatic immunity: State practice under the Vienna convention on diplomatic relations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 37. 1988: 53

Canada. SCC Amaratunga v. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, 2013 SCC 66, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 866 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13364/index.do

CCC Judgment C-254 of 2003.

CCC Judgment C-267 of 2014.

CCC Judgment C-788 of 2011.

CCC Judgment T-093 of 2012.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Resolution 1979 (2014)1 Accountability of international organizations for human rights violations Parliamentary Assembly. Council of Europe.

DE BRABANDERE, Eric. Belgian Courts and the Immunity of International Organizations. International Organizations Law Review 10.2 2014: 464-504.

DENZA, Eileen. Diplomatic law: commentary on the Vienna convention on diplomatic relations. Oxford University Press, 2016.

EVANS, Malcolm. International Law. Fifth Edition. 2018. Oxford.

EVANS, Malcolm. International Law. Second Edition. 2006. Oxford. pp. 408-411.

GARCÍA-MATAMOROS, Laura Victoria, ARÉVALO-RAMÍREZ, Walter. Dos décadas de debates entre la Constitución de 1991 y el derecho internacional: El control constitucional de los tratados, las enmiendas constitucionales y la oposición a sentencias de tribunales internacionales. De la constitución de 1991 a la realidad: Debates políticos, jurídicos, territoriales e internacionales. Universidad del Rosario, 2015. 347-376.

GODIO, Leopoldo. Evolución, actualidad y tendencias en materia de privilegios e inmunidades de organismos internacionales. Revista RECORDIP 1.2. 2011.

I.C.J Effect of Awards of Compensation Made by the U.N. Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, 1954 I.C.J. 47 (July 13)

I.C.J. Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1989, p. 177.

I.C.J. Diference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1999, p. 62

INSTITUT DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL. Session of Oslo – 1977 Contracts Concluded by International Organizations with Private Persons (Fourth Commission, Rapporteur : Mr Nicolas Valticos.

MACKENZIE, David Clark. A world beyond borders: An introduction to the history of international organizations. Vol. 1. University of Toronto Press, 2010.

MACLEAN, Robert Joseph-Blaise, ARÉVALO RAMÍREZ, Walter. The Expulsion of Resident Colombian Nationals during the Colombia-Venezuela Border Dispute: An “Under the Radar” Case for Diplomatic Protection of Human Rights?. Vniversitas 68.138. 2019.

MILLER, Anthony. Privileges and immunities of United Nations officials. International Organizations Law Review 4.2. 2008: 169-257.

MULLER, A. Sam. International organizations and their host states: aspects of their legal relationship. Vol. 21. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995.

Netherlands. X et al. v.European School Munich I63 the Bavarian appellate Administrative Court, US-Iran Claims Tribunal v AS, 96 ILR 321, 329 (Netherlands Supreme Court, 1985)

NOLLKAEMPER, André, et al., eds. International law in domestic courts: a casebook. Oxford University Press, USA, 2019.

OAS Informe del comité jurídico interamericano. Inmunidades de las organizaciones internacionales, (93o período ordinario de sesiones OEA/Ser. Q 6 al 16 de agosto 2018) CJI/doc.554/18 rev.2 Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 16 agosto 2018.

OKEKE, Edward Chukwuemeke. Jurisdictional immunities of states and international organizations. Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. 294.

QUINTANA ARANGUREN, Juan José, GUZMÁN CARRASCO, Gonzalo. De espaldas al derecho internacional: Colombia y la inmunidad de jurisdicción de los Estados. International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 8. 2006: 53-102.

REINISCH, August, WEBER, Ulf Andreas. In the shadow of Waite and Kennedy-The jurisdictional immunity of international organizations, the individual's right of access to the courts and administrative tribunals as alternative means of dispute settlement. International Organizations. Law Review. 1. 2004: 59.

REINISCH, August. Contracts between International Organizations and Private Law Persons. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law 7. 2006: 754

REINISCH, August. International organizations before national courts. No. 10. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

RIOS, Greta L., FLAHERTY Edward. International Organization Reform of Impunity-Immunity is the Problem. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law. 16. 2009:. 433.

RYNGAERT, Cedric, PENNINGS Frans. Jurisdictional immunity and infringement of fundamental labor rights. International Labor Rights Case Law 3.3 2017: 327-332.

RYNGAERT, Cedric. Immunities of International Organizations Before Domestic Courts: Reflections on the Collective Labour Case Against the European Patent Organization. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, 2016. 393-408.

SARMIENTO LAMUS, Andrés. ¿Es la "Paradoja Baxter" una verdadera paradoja? La práctica de los Estados, entre la formación del derecho internacional consuetudinario y la interpretación de tratados" Derecho Internacional Público, Derecho Internacional de la Inversión Extranjera ABELLO-GALVIS, Ricardo, ARÉVALO RAMÍREZ, Walter. Editors. Universidad del Rosario. pp .57 - 75 ,2019.

SINGER, Michael. Jurisdictional Immunity of International Organizations: Human Rights and Functional Necessity Concerns. Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 36. 1995: 53.

STEWART, David P. The UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property. The American Journal of International Law 99.1. 2005: 194-211.

TESFAGABIR, Kibrom. The state of functional immunity of international organizations and their officials and why it should be streamlined. Chinese Journal of International Law 10.1.2011. 97-128.

VAN ERT, Gib, ALLEN, Greg J. ROBB, Rebecca. Canadian Cases in Public International Law in 2013. Canadian Yearbook of International Law. 51, 2013: 535.

WEBB, Philippa. The Immunity of States, Diplomats and International Organizations in Employment Disputes: The New Human Rights Dilemma?. European Journal of International Law 27.3 2016. 745-767.

WOJCIKIEWICZ ALMEIDA, Paula. L’affaire des immunités juridictionnelles de l’Etat (Allemagne c. Italie): la Cour Internationale de Justice à contre-sens de l’évolution du droit international. ACDI-Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional .11 2018: 21-70.

WOOD, Michael. Do international organizations enjoy immunity under customary international law?. Immunity of International Organizations. Brill Nijhoff, 2015. 29-60.

WOOD, Michael. International Organizations and Customary International Law. Vanderbilt journal of transnational law 48.3. 2015: 609.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v18i1.7264

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia