Engaging the U.N. Guiding principles on business and human rights: the inter-american commission on human rights & the extractive sector

Cindy Woods

Resumo


In recent years, the business and human rights movement has climbed to the top of the international human rights agenda. Starting in the 1970s, as multinational corporations increased in fiscal and political power throughout the neoliberal boom of the era, and as corporate complicity in large scale human rights abuses came to light, civil society and governments alike began to push for increased corporate accountability.1 After multiple failed endeavors within the United Nations system at drafting a binding code of conduct for transnational corporations, in 2011, the Human Rights Council adopted the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Guiding Principles).2 These principles lay out, in three pillars, the state duty to protect individuals against human rights abuses; the corporate responsibility to respect human rights; and the need for greater access to judicial and non-judicial remedies for victims of corporate human rights abuse.3 Following the endorsement of the Guiding Principles, the subsequently created Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises called upon states to begin operationalizing the Guiding Principles through the creation of National Action Plans (NAPs)—“evolving policy strateg[ies]” aimed at creating cohesive and coherent implementation.4 Over thirty countries have committed to creating a NAP, including many within the inter-American system, signaling the region’s readiness to engage with the Guiding Principles. 5

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Address Delivered by Salvador Allende Gossens, Pre¬sident of Chile, at the inaugural ceremony on 13 April 1973, United Nations Conference on Trade and De¬velopment, Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Apr. 13-May 21, 1972, ¶ 62, U.N. Doc. TD/180 (Vol. 1), Annex VIII (1973).

U.N. Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implemen¬ting the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Fra¬mework: Rep. of the Special Representative of the Secretary- General on the Issue of Human Rts. and Transnat’l Corp. and other Bus. Enter., John Ruggie, Annex, U.N. Doc. A/ HRC/17/31 (Mar. 21, 2011)

Cindy S. Woods, “It Isn’t A State Problem”: The Minas Con¬ga Mine Controversy and the Need for Binding International Obligations on Corporate Actors, 46 Geo. J. Int. L. 629, 635-39 (2015).

U.N. Working Group on Business and Human Rights, Guidance on National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights ii (2014)

Compare State National Action Plans, U.N. Human Rights Office of the High Commissioners for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/ NationalActionPlans.aspx (last visited Apr. 8, 2015)

National Action Plans, Business & Human Rights Re¬source Center. http://business-humanrights.org/en/ un-guiding-principles/implementation-tools-exam¬ples/implementation-by-governments/by-type-of-ini-tiative/national-action-plans (last visited Apr. 8, 2015).

Organization of American States, Resolution Promo¬tion and Protection of Human Rights in Business, OAS AG/RES. 2840 (XLIV-O/14) (June 4, 2014)

Comm’n on Human Rights Res. 2005/69, Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Bu¬siness Enterprises, U.N. Doc.E/CN.4/RES/2005/69 (Apr. 20, 2005).

Special Rep. of the Sec’y Gen. on the issue of human rights and transnat’l corps. and other bus. enters., John Ruggie, Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Inclu¬ding the Right to Development: Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights, U.N. Doc. A/ HRC/8/5 (Apr. 7, 2008).

Human Rights Council Res. 17/4, Human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterpri¬ses, 17th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/HRC/Res/17/4 (July 6, 2011).

The Danish Institute for Human Rts. & The Int’l Corp. Accountability Roundtable, National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights: A Toolkit for the Deve¬lopment, Implementation and Review of State Com-mitments to Business and Human Rights 16-17 (2014).

Christopher Smart, Announcement of Opportunity to Pro¬vide Input into the U.S. National Action Plan on Responsible Business Conduct, U.S. National Security Council (Nov. 20, 2014; 1:29 PM), https://www.whitehouse.gov/ blog/2014/11/20/announcement-opportunity-provi¬de-input-us-national-action-plan-responsible-business- (last visited Apr. 10, 2015)

ICAR & PODER Partner to Support the Development of a National Action Plan on Business & Human Rights in Mexi¬co, International Corporate Accountability Roundtable, http://accountabilityroundtable.org/analysis/icarpo¬derprojectmexiconap/ (last visited Apr. 10, 2015).

Letter to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on Integrating Business and Human Rights, International Corporate Accountability Roundtable (Dec. 18, 2014),

http://accountabilityroundtable.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/12/ICAR-Letter-to-Inter-American- Commission.pdf (last visited Apr. 10, 2015).

Subsecretario Edgardo Riveros participó en Foro Anual so¬bre Derechos Humanos y Empresas en Naciones Unidas, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Chile (Dec. 2, 2014),

http://www.minrel.gov.cl/subsecretario-edgardo-riveros-participo-en-foro-anual-sobre-de¬rechos-humanos-y-empresas-en-naciones-unidas/ minrel/2014-12-03/100147.html (last visited Apr. 10, 2015).

Organization of American States, Charter of the Organization of American States (Signed in Bogotá in 1948 and amended by the Protocol of Buenos Aires in 1967, by the Protocol of Cartagena de Indias in 1985, by the Protocol of Washington in 1992, and by the Protocol of Managua in 1993), Apr. 30, 1948, 1609 U.N.T.S. 48.

Organization of American States, American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San Jose”, Costa Rica, Nov. 22, 1969, OAS Treaty Series No. 36; 1144 U.N.T.S. 123

Organization of American States, Statute of the Inter- American Commission on Human Rights, Oct. 1, 1979, O.A.S. Off. Rec. OEA/Ser.P/IX.0.2/80, Vol. 1 at 88.

Petition and Case System Informational Brochure, Inter-Ame¬rican Commission on Human Rights, https://www.oas. org/en/iachr/docs/pdf/HowTo.pdf (last visited Apr. 13, 2015).

Organization of American States, Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Annual Report of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 1991, O.A.S. Doc. OEA/Ser.L/V/III.25 doc.7 at 18 (1992).

Thematic Rapporteurships and Units, Organization of Ame¬rican States, http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/mandate/ rapporteurships.asp (last visited Apr. 13, 2015).

Unit on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Organization of American States, http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/ desc/ (last visited Apr. 13, 2015

Process for Strengthening the IACHR: Methodology, Orga¬nization of American States, http://www.oas.org/en/ iachr/mandate/strengthening.asp (last visited Apr. 13, 2015).

Paulo Vannuchi, Comm’r Unit on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Presentation at the Special Meeting of the Permanent Council of the Organization of Ame¬rican States on Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in Business (Jan. 28, 2015)

Jorge Daniel Taillant, Remarks at the Special Meeting on Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in Bu-siness, OAS Permanent Council (Jan. 29, 2015).

UN General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A, Dec. 10, 1948, U.N. Doc. A/810.

Request for an Advisory Opinion by the Government of the Republic of Panama (Apr. 28, 2014), http:// www.corteidh.or.cr/solicitudoc/solicitud_14_11_14_ ing.pdf (last visited Apr. 18, 2015).

Letter to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on Integrating Business and Human Rights, International Corporate Accountability Roundtable (Dec. 18, 2014), http://accountabilityroundtable.org/wp-content/ uploads/2014/12/ICAR-Letter-to-Inter-American- Commission.pdf (last visited Apr. 10, 2015).

Rapporteurship on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Organi¬zation of American States, http://www.oas.org/en/ia¬chr/indigenous/default.asp (last visited Apr. 23, 2015).

Saramaka People v. Suriname, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Nov. 28, 2007)

Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v. Ecuador, Merits and Reparations, Judgment, (June 27, 2012)

IACHR Takes Case involving Kaliña and Lokono Peoples v. Suriname to the Inter-American Court (Feb. 4, 2014), available at http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/media_center/ PReleases/2014/009.asp (last visited Apr. 23).

Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. ¶ 118 (Mar. 29, 2006); Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, Merits, Reparations and Costs, Judgment, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. ¶ 137 (June 17, 2005).

Indigenous Communities of the Xingu River Basin, Pará, Brazil, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., PM 382/10 (Apr. 1, 2011).

Communities of the Maya People (Sipakepense and Mam) of the Sipacapa and San Miguel Ixtahuacán Mu-nicipalities in the Department of San Marcos, Guate¬mala, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., PM 260/07 (May 20, 2010).

Human Rights Situation of Leaders and Defenders of the Shuar People in Ecuador, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 17, 2015)

Extractive Industries and Human Rights of the Mapuche People in Chile, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 17, 2015)

Corporations, Human Rights, and Prior Consultation in the Americas, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 17, 2015)

Human Rights and Extractive Industries in Latin America, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 19, 2015)

The Right to Property and the Right to a Healthy Environment of Indigenous Peoples in Bocas del Toro, Panama, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 20, 2015)

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Indige¬nous peoples in Voluntary Isolation and Initial Contact in the Americas, OEA/Ser.L/V/II, Doc. 47/13 (Dec. 58830, 2013) ¶¶ 101-14.

Rapporteurship on Human Rights Defenders, Organization of American States, http://oas.org/en/iachr/defen¬ders/reports/thematic.asp (last visited Apr. 18, 2015).

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Second Report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders in the Americas (2011)

Marco Arana, Mirta Vásquez, et al., Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., PM (Apr. 23, 2007), available at http://www.cidh. org/medidas/2006.eng.htm (last visited Apr. 19, 2015).

Telma Yolanda Oqueli Veliz and family, Guatemala, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., PM 207/12 (Aug. 22, 2012).

Social Protest and Human Rights in the Americas, Hearing Be¬fore the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 16, 2015)

Human Rights and Social Protest in Guatemala, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Oct. 28, 2013)

Situation of Human Rights Defenders in Guatemala, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Oct. 28, 2014)

Situation of Human Rights Defenders in the Americas, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 24, 2014)

Situation of the Right to Freedom of Association and Environmental Defenders in Ecuador, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 28, 2014)

Situation of Human Rights Defenders in Brazil, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Oct. 29, 2013)

Situation of Human Rights Defenders in Guatemala, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Oct. 28, 2013)

Improper Use of Criminal Law to Criminalize Human Rights Defender, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Oct. 31, 2014).

Human Rights and Extractive Industries in Latin America, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Mar. 19, 2015)

Impact of Canadian Mining Activities on Human Rights in Latin America, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Oct. 28, 2014)

Development and Extractive Industries in Colombia, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R. (Oct. 31, 2013)

Human Rights Situation of People Affected by Mining in the Americas and the Responsibilities of the Host and Home Sta¬tes of the Mining Companies, Hearing Before the Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R (Nov. 1, 2013)

Antonie Perret, Private Security Trends and Challenges in Latin America [Student’s Paper Series] Western Hemisphere Security Analysis Center (Aug. 1, 2011), available at http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?ar ticle=1036&context=whemsac.

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report on Citizen Security and Human Rights, OEA/Ser.L/V/ II (Dec. 31, 2009) 39-46

Organization of American States, Charter of the Organization of

American States (Signed in Bogotá in 1948 and amended by the Protocol of Buenos Aires in 1967, by the Protocol of Cartagena de Indias in 1985, by the Protocol of Washington in 1992, and by the Protocol of Managua in 1993), Apr. 30, 1948, 1609 U.N.T.S. 48.

Constitución Política de la República de Chile [C.P.] art. 57; Law No. 29785, Sept. 7, 2011, Diario Official [D.O.] (Perú).

Steven Fox & Trevor Sutton, Ground Rules: Cultivating Investments through Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, Vera¬city (2015)

Amy K. Lehr & Gare A. Smith, Implementing a Corporate Free, Prior, and Informed Consent Policy: Benefits and Challen¬ges, Foley Hoag, LLP (2010) 28 U.S.C. § 1350.

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. Ct. 1658 (2013).

Elizabeth Holland, ATS Case Developments Post-Kiobel: Interpreting the “Touch and Concern” Standard, Corpora¬te Social Responsibility and the Law (Sept. 13, 2013)

http://www.csrandthelaw.com/2013/09/13/case-developments-post-kiobel-interpreting-the-touch-and-concern-standard/ (last visited Sept. 27, 2015)

Post-Kiobel, the Lower Courts are only Pretending to Apply the Presumption against Extraterritoriality in Alien Tort Sta¬tute Cases, The View From LL2, http://viewfromll2. com/2014/07/22/post-kiobel-the-lower-courts-are-only-pretending-to-apply-the-presumption-against-ex¬traterritoriality-in-alien-tort-statute-cases/ (last visited Sept. 27, 2015)

Cardona, et al. v. Chiquita Brands International, et al. No. 12- 14898 (11th Cir. 2014).

Chiquita lawsuits (re Colombia), Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, http://business-humanrights.org/ en/chiquita-lawsuits-re-colombia (last visited Sept. 27, 2015)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v12i2.3572

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia