Integrated contract in Law 14.133/2021: new law, same problems? A study of comparative law

Bruno Ribeiro Marques, Odilon Cavallari de Oliveira, Paulo Cavichioli Carmona

Résumé


The purpose of this article is to analyze whether expansion allowed cases for design-build biddings might improve positive impacts on the efficiency of public procedures. Hence, both Brazilian and international experiences will be studied with attention to design-build and turnkey contracts. In integrated contracting procurements, basic and executive projects must be done by the same company that shall execute the project and its further execution. Consequently, public Administration must only provide a draft. Resolutely, the hypothesis is that these amplification allowances increase the risks of other contract failures. The methodology used was a dialectical-inductive method comparing both Brazilian and international cases of integrated contracts. Firstly, it is demonstrated when Design-Build procurements were first allowed in Brazil and how and why their uses have been amplified. Additionally, the international scenario shall be examined to determine if restrictions imposed by most countries have accompanied the use of integrated contracts for public Administration in Brazil. Subsequently, a comparative examination of several hiring public models will be examined to answer whether integrated contracts biddings might benefit public sectors. The conclusion is that significant expansion of possibilities of using the integrated contracting, forecasted in Law 14.133/2021, poses risks of reducing the efficiency of public administration unless several measures are to be adopted in the planning phase with particular attention to those related to the draft selecting requirements, just like most developed countries have already done.

Mots-clés


Project. Integrated contracting. Law n. 14.133/2021. Design-build. Comparative Law.

Texte intégral :

PDF (English)

Références


AL-RESHAID, K.; KARTAM, N. Design-build pre-qualification in tendering approach for public projects. International Journal of Project Management, [S.I], vol. 23, n. 4, p. 309-320, 2005. Available at: www.sicencedirect.com. Access in: 30 set. 2021.

ALEXY, R. Teoria dos direitos fundamentais. Translation: Virgílio Afonso da Silva. São Paulo: Malheiros. 2008.

BAETA, A. P. As vantagens dos concursos para a contratação de projetos. Available at: . Access in: 25 set. 2021.

BONATTO, H. O conteúdo do anteprojeto de engenharia no regime de contratação integrada. Revista Jurídica da Procuradoria-Geral do Estado do Paraná, Curitiba, n. 7, p. 285-314, 2016.

BRAZIL. Chamber of Deputies. Budget Consulting and Financial Inspection. Technical Note 1/2015. Available at: . Access in: 20 set. 2021.

BRAZIL. Ministry of Transparency, Inspection, and Comptroller General of the Union. Audit Report O.S. n. 201505075. Available at: . Access in: 20 set. 2021.

CARPENTER, N.; BAUSMAN, D. Project Delivery Performance for Public School Construction? Design-Build versus CM at Risk. California, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 142, n. 10, n.p, 2016. Available at: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001155. Access in: 30 set. 2021.

COASE, R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica, London, New Series, v. 4, n. 16, p. 386-405, nov. 1937.

DAL POZZO, A. N. O direito administrativo da infraestrutura. São Paulo: Contracorrente, 2020.

DOSUMO, O. S. Perceived effects of prevalence errors in contract documents in construction projects. Construction Projects and Buildings, [S.I], v. 18, n. 1, p. 1- 26, mar. 2018. Available at:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324085237_Perceived_Effects_of_Prevalent_Errors_in_Contract_Documents_on_Construction_Projects. Access in: 30 sets. 2019.

FLYVBJERG, B. Survival of the most unfit: why the worst infrastructure is built and what we can do about it. Oxford, U.K., Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 25, n. 3, p. 344–367, 2009.

HUPPERT, R. La gestion des ProJet’s publics dans les pays en voi de development. [S.I], Tier-Monde, vol. 22, n. 87, p. 613-627, 1981. Available at: https://www.persee.fr/doc/tiers_0040-7356_1981_num_22_87_4050. Access in: 30 set. 2021.

JUSTEN FILHO, M. Comentários à lei de licitações e contratações administrativas: Lei 14.133/2021. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brazil, 2021.

LARSEN, J.K. [et. al]. Factors affecting schedule delay cost overrun and quality level in public constructions projects. Journal of Management in Engineering. Hong Kong, vol. 32, n.1, p.1-10, jan. 2016.

PARK, J.; Kwak, Y.H. Design-Bid-Build (DBB) vs. Design-Build (D.B.) in the U.S. public transportation projects: The choice and consequences. International Public of Project Management, [S.I], vol 35, n. 3, p 1-16. Available at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman. Access in: 30 set. 2021.

PEREIRA JUNIOR, J. T.; DOTTI, M. R. Regime de contratação integrada: vinculante ou discricionário? Brasília, Revista do Tribunal de Contas da União, n. 142, p. 48-64, mai/dez. 2018.

RODRÍGUEZ, A. H. Los contratos internacionales de construcción Llave em mano. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, v. 6, n. 1, p. 161-235, mar. 2014.

SINAENCO; CAU/BR. Dossiê atualizado sobre a ineficiência da Contratação Integrada no Brazil. Available at: < http://www.caubr.gov.br/dossie-comprova-ineficacia-da-contratacao-integrada-no-dnit>. Access in: 20 set. 2021.

WILLIAMSON, O. E. The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. [S. I], The American Journal of Sociology, v. 87, n. 3, p. 548-577, 1981. Available at: . Access in: 20 set. 2021.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324085237_Perceived_Effects_of_Prevalent_Errors_in_Contract_Documents_on_Construction_Projects. Access in 30 sets. 2019.

HUPPERT, R. La gestion des ProJet’s publics dans les pays en voi de development. [S.I], Tier-Monde, vol. 22, n. 87, p. 613-627, 1981. Available at: https://www.persee.fr/doc/tiers_0040-7356_1981_num_22_87_4050. Access in: 30 set. 2021.

JUSTEN FILHO, Marçal. Comentários à lei de licitações e contratações administrativas: Lei 14.133/2021. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2021, p. 586-588.

LARSEN, JK [et. al]. Factors affecting schedule delay cost overrun and quality level in public constructions projects. Hong Kong, vol. 32, n.1, Jan. p.1-10, 2016.

PARK, J.; Kwak, Y.H. Design-Bid-Build (DBB) vs. Design-Build (DB) in the U.S. public transportation projects: The choice and consequences. International Public of Project Management, [S.I], vol 35, n 3, p 1-16, p. 16 Available at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijproman. Access in 30 set. 2021.

PEREIRA JUNIOR, Jessé Torres; DOTTI, Marinês Restelatto. Regime de contratação integrada: vinculante ou discricionário? Revista do Tribunal de Contas da União, n. 142, p. 60, mai/dez. 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v11i3.8062

ISSN 2179-8338 (impresso) - ISSN 2236-1677 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia